Course Details
Course Details
What You'll Learn
Topic 1: Creative Strategy and End-to-End Video Production with Agentic AI
Topic 2: AI-Assisted Video Editing, Storytelling and Quality Assurance
Topic 3: Workflow Optimisation, Industry Compliance and Emerging Video Technologies
Assessment
- Written Exam
- Practical Exam
Course Info
Promotion Code
Promo or discount cannot be applied to WSQ courses
Minimum Entry Requirement
Knowledge and Skills
- Able to operate using computer functions
- Minimum 3 GCE ‘O’ Levels Passes including English or WPL Level 5 (Average of Reading, Listening, Speaking & Writing Scores)
Attitude
- Positive Learning Attitude
- Enthusiastic Learner
Experience
- Minimum of 1 year of working experience.
Minimum Software/Hardware Requirement
Software:
You can download and install the following software:
Hardware:Mac Laptops
About Progressive Wage Model (PWM)
The Progressive Wage Model (PWM) helps to increase wages of workers through upgrading skills and improving productivity.
Employers must ensure that their Singapore citizen and PR workers meet the PWM training requirements of attaining at least 1 Workforce Skills Qualification (WSQ) Statement of Attainment, out of the list of approved WSQ training modules.
For more information on PWM, please visit MOM site.
Funding Eligility Criteria
| Individual Sponsored Trainee | Employer Sponsored Trainee |
|
|
|
SkillsFuture Credit:
PSEA:
|
Absentee Payroll (AP) Funding:
SFEC:
|
Steps to Apply Skills Future Claim
- The staff will send you an invoice with the fee breakdown.
- Login to the MySkillsFuture portal, select the course you’re enrolling on and enter the course date and schedule.
- Enter the course fee payable by you (including GST) and enter the amount of credit to claim.
- Upload your invoice and click ‘Submit’
SkillsFuture Level-Up Program
The SkillsFuture Level-Up Programme provides greater structural support for mid-career Singaporeans aged 40 years and above to pursue a substantive skills reboot and stay relevant in a changing economy. For more information, visit SkillsFuture Level-Up Programme
Get Additional Course Fee Support Up to $500 under UTAP
The Union Training Assistance Programme (UTAP) is a training benefit provided to NTUC Union Members with an objective of encouraging them to upgrade with skills training. It is provided to minimize the training cost. If you are a NTUC Union Member then you can get 50% funding (capped at $500 per year) under Union Training Assistance Programme (UTAP).
For more information visit NTUC U Portal – Union Training Assistance Program (UTAP)
Steps to Apply UTAP
- Log in to your U Portal account to submit your UTAP application upon completion of the course.
Note
- SWDA subsidy is available for Singapore Citizens, Permanent Residents, and Corporates.
- All Singaporeans aged 25 and above can use their SkillsFuture Credit to pay. For more details, visit www.skillsfuture.gov.sg/credit
- An unfunded course fee can be claimed via SkillsFuture Credit or paid in cash.
- UTAP funding for NTUC Union Members is capped at $250 for 39 years and below and at $500 for 40 years and above.
- UTAP support amount will be paid to training provider first and claimed after end of class by learner.
Appeal Process
- The candidate has the right to disagree with the assessment decision made by the assessor.
- When giving feedback to the candidate, the assessor must check with the candidate if he agrees with the assessment outcome.
- If the candidate agrees with the assessment outcome, the assessor & the candidate must sign the Assessment Summary Record.
- If the candidate disagrees with the assessment outcome, he/she should not sign in the Assessment Summary Record.
- If the candidate intends to appeal the decision, he/she should first discuss the matter with the assessor/assessment manager.
- If the candidate is still not satisfied with the decision, the candidate must notify the assessor of the decision to appeal. The assessor will reflect the candidate’s intention in the Feedback Section of the Assessment Summary Record.
- The assessor will notify the assessor manager about the candidate’s intention to lodge an appeal.
- The candidate must lodge the appeal within 7 days, giving reasons for appeal
- The assessor can help the candidate with writing and lodging the appeal.
- he assessment manager will collect information from the candidate & assessor and give a final decision.
- A record of the appeal and any subsequent actions and findings will be made.
- An Assessment Appeal Panel will be formed to review and give a decision.
- The outcome of the appeal will be made known to the candidate within 2 weeks from the date the appeal was lodged.
- The decision of the Assessment Appeal Panel is final and no further appeal will be entertained.
- Please click the link below to fill up the Candidates Appeal Form.
Job Roles
Job Roles
- Video Editor
- Post-production Specialist
- Creative Director
- Multimedia Producer
- Digital Content Creator
- Visual Storyteller
- Motion Graphics Designer
- Media Production Manager
- Film Editor
- YouTube Channel Manager
- Marketing Video Producer
- Social Media Video Strategist
- Advertising Content Specialist
- Broadcast Technician
- Visual Effects (VFX) Assistant
- Creative Technologist
- Production Coordinator
- Corporate Video Editor
- Online Content Strategist
- Interactive Media Specialist
Trainers
Trainers
Truman Ng is a senior cloud and AI infrastructure specialist with over 20 years of experience in enterprise IT, cybersecurity, and AI automation. A PMP, ACTA, and Huawei HCIE-certified professional, he has trained global teams in cloud deployment, DevOps, and AI systems integration. His expertise lies in designing secure, scalable AI pipelines and integrating automation tools such as n8n into enterprise environments to improve operational efficiency and collaboration.
In “Automate Creative Video Editing with Agentic AI Workflows and n8n,” Truman demonstrates how to integrate AI-driven workflows into cloud-based media systems. His sessions highlight automation architecture, API orchestration, and the use of multi-agent AI systems for content production. Through real-world applications, he enables participants to design resilient, automated video editing pipelines powered by n8n and agentic AI frameworks.
James Lee is a veteran digital media and IT educator with over two decades of experience in creative technology, multimedia design, and digital transformation. An Adobe Certified Expert and ACLP-qualified trainer, he has taught professionals and creative teams to leverage automation and AI tools to enhance media production efficiency. His approach emphasizes accessibility, creativity, and practical problem-solving through technology.
In “Automate Creative Video Editing with Agentic AI Workflows and n8n,” James introduces learners to creative automation strategies that merge design thinking with AI workflows. His sessions cover intelligent video editing, AI-assisted storytelling, and n8n workflow integration for creative professionals. By combining multimedia design expertise with automation frameworks, he helps participants reimagine how agentic AI can streamline video production while maintaining artistic quality.
Review
Customer Reviews (10)
- Average Rating: 3.0/5 Review by Course Participant/Trainee
-
The course details stated online is 40-50% different from what being taught. (Posted on 9/25/2026)1. Do you find the course meet your expectation? 2. Do you find the trainer knowledgeable in this subject? 3. How do you find the training environment - Average Rating: 3.0/5 Review by Course Participant/Trainee
-
Course objectives and the training provided deviated. To check on course description again. (Posted on 9/25/2026)1. Do you find the course meet your expectation? 2. Do you find the trainer knowledgeable in this subject? 3. How do you find the training environment - Average Rating: 2.0/5 Review by Course Participant/Trainee
-
The coding component was helpful, and I appreciate the skills shared during the session. However, the title “Agentic for Video Creation” led me to expect a more hands-on opportunity to create videos using AI. A clearer title that is more closely reflects the session content would help participants understand what to expect. (Posted on 9/25/2026)1. Do you find the course meet your expectation? 2. Do you find the trainer knowledgeable in this subject? 3. How do you find the training environment - Average Rating: 1.3/5 Review by Course Participant/Trainee
-
The course title and description were somewhat misleading compared to the actual content and learning experience. At the start of Day 1, the trainer did not clearly explain the module objectives or provide an overview of what we would be learning. Instead, we were given a number of files (Labs2) to work on and research independently, despite having shared that we had little to no prior knowledge of the subject.1. Do you find the course meet your expectation? 2. Do you find the trainer knowledgeable in this subject? 3. How do you find the training environment
The trainer also did not clearly demonstrate the steps or processes involved. For example, instead of walking us through the video upload process on screen, we were instructed to complete the tasks ourselves and use ChatGPT if we needed assistance.
During the assessment, we found it challenging to answer many of the questions, particularly as several of the terms were unfamiliar to us, such as Remotion, Manim, Higgsfield, FFmpeg and Kanban. These terms and concepts were not adequately introduced or taught during the course.
t the end of the two-day course, we were still unclear about the overall objectives and what we were expected to have learned. We left the course feeling that we had not gained a clear understanding of the subject or acquired the expected knowledge and skills. It felt as though we had attended a two-day class but walked away empty-handed, without a clear understanding of what had been taught or how we could apply the knowledge.
For future lessons, it would be helpful for the trainer to clearly explain the learning objectives at the beginning of the course and provide relevant examples or demonstrations before moving into the practical exercises. A step-by-step demonstration of the processes would also help participants understand what is expected before attempting the tasks independently.
It is sad that we do not get to enjoy the magic of AI by forming fun videos in class out of work environment. (Posted on 9/25/2026) - Average Rating: 1.0/5 Review by Course Participant/Trainee
-
Very disappointing course — did not meet the advertised learning outcomes1. Do you find the course meet your expectation? 2. Do you find the trainer knowledgeable in this subject? 3. How do you find the training environment
I attended Tertiary Infotech’s WSQ Agentic AI for Video Creation course and unfortunately found that the actual training did not meet the learning objectives and expectations stated in the course description.
A significant portion of the course time was not spent teaching or explaining the stated course content. In my experience, approximately 90% of the time was not focused on properly covering the advertised content or addressing questions relating to the learning objectives.
When students had questions or difficulties understanding the content, the questions were often not properly addressed. In my case, when I asked questions relating to the course content, the instructor did not directly answer the question and instead diverted the discussion to other topics. I found this unhelpful as I was asking the questions specifically to understand the stated course material.
The assessment was also completely not aligned with the course content that was taught. There appeared to be a significant mismatch between what was covered during the training and what students were subsequently expected to demonstrate during the assessment. This made it difficult to see how the assessment directly reflected the learning objectives that had been taught.
During the assessment period, I also observed the instructor watching videos instead of actively assisting students with the assessment or addressing their questions. This added to my concern about the level of instructional support provided during the course.
I also found the instructor’s communication with students very inappropriate. When I asked questions about the course content, I felt that I was being blamed rather than having my questions properly addressed. At one point, the instructor, Mak Wai Keong, told me that I behaved like an “ITE student.” I found this remark unnecessary and disrespectful in a professional learning environment. Total unacceptable
This was not only my personal impression. The students who attended the course also felt that the course did not meet the stated learning objectives and outcomes.
I also noticed that Mak Wai Keong was the instructor who conducted our course, but his name was not listed among the instructors on Tertiary Infotech’s course webpage when I checked it. I believe the training provider should clarify why the instructor conducting the course differed from the instructor information presented on the website.
Overall, I believe the actual course delivery, instructor conduct, assessment and assessment alignment should be reviewed against the advertised learning outcomes and course content. And to be reviewed by Skills Future for auditing (Posted on 9/25/2026)
Write Your Own Review
- Recommended Courses
- Related Courses